How CriptoCheck works
13 independent checks, zero scores, maximum transparency
Why no aggregate score
A single score (like "73/100 safe") is easier to grasp at a glance, but hides more than it reveals: two tokens with the same score can have completely different risk profiles. There's also a regulatory reason: providing an aggregated safety assessment can come dangerously close to "virtual currency advisory services", a regulated activity in several jurisdictions (including the EU, under MiCA). Showing only verifiable technical data, without a final verdict, keeps us in the territory of public information.
The 13 indicators, by category
- •Mint authority revoked
- •Freeze authority revoked
- •Official Jupiter verification
- •Locked percentage, dollar-weighted average across all of the token's pools, not just the largest one
- •Largest holder's percentage
- •Total number of holders
- •Developer wallet's share
- •Hidden trading fee
- •Sell test (honeypot)
- •Ticker clones
- •Identical amounts among holders (the only one validated against real cases)
- •Common funder (experimental, informational only)
- •RugCheck insider signals (experimental, informational only)
Where the data comes from
What we do NOT do
We don't give investment advice. We have no ads. We don't sell data. We don't guarantee that a token with all-green indicators is 100% safe — we reduce specific, documented risks, we don't eliminate risk entirely.
Ready to try it on a real token?
Check a token →